So chuffed to announce that my fashion nude workshop with Anita is sold out—big thanks to those who signed up!
Because it sold out so quickly, I will conduct a second workshop on the same day, October 19th, between 10am to 2pm at The Lumen Room, if there is enough interest: that is, should there be at least two persons signing up, the class will go ahead. The workshop fees will remain the same, at S$200, and will still be limited to 4 photographers only.
Sign up, spread the word, or better yet, both!
I’m stoked to announce I will be conducting a fashion nude workshop with internationally-published art nude and fetish model, Anita De Bauch, on Sunday, October 19th, 2014, between 2pm to 6pm.
The 4-hour workshop will be held at The Lumen Room, a beautifully decorated space for arts, dance and wellness. Anita is one of my favourite persons to work with, and brings style, experience, and a great attitude to every shoot. To give every participant enough time for guidance and with Anita, the workshop will only be open to 4 participants, on a first-come, first-serve basis. The price per person is S$200.
Contact me via email at firstname.lastname@example.org for bookings and more information. Participants must pay the full fees upfront to secure their spot; payment details will be provided via email.
Share the word, and hope to see you there on October 19th.
Just a short update while I get my life back in order; there have been some major changes since the last post, one of which is me finding a full-time job (thanks Adam!) that I’m pretty good at and that I enjoy. I’ve been rearranging my schedule since then, but any commitments I’ve made prior to this will be honoured, and I won’t be quitting photography :)
If anything, this job has enabled me to meet interesting people more frequently, and photography is part of the job. Here’s a photograph of Mr Ling Tai Meng, who owns an old-school men’s hairdressing salon in the Ubi industrial area.
In the meantime, I’m working on Nisshi Vol. V. The editing process slowed down since I landed the job, and between that, family commitments, and Diablo 3 (yeah, I’m an obsessive gamer), I’m slowly whittling the selection down. This volume will have fewer photos, and I might even do something different. As always, it’ll be ready when it’s ready.
Gotta find time to make some portraits as well, as I’ve been ignoring that itch for quite a while now. Time to find some beautiful people and put them in front of my camera….
Article was originally published on my old blog on July 4th, 2013. Reposting because it’s still relevant to me.
I read this Julian Stallabrass article this morning, and it bothered me in some ways. Leaving aside my usual dismissive ”the article failed the 1978 test”  pronouncements, it appeared to be defeatist in his appraisal of photography, unless I totally misunderstood him.
Saying “If everyone is a photographer, then no-one is a photographer” and being reluctant to say if he is a photographer or not (again, the 1978 test is really apropos here, proving Szarkowski’s prescience, and still massive influence) does not make me doubt my interpretation. This choice quote at the end of his article is quite telling:
“It is not only harder to say whether or not you are a photographer, but harder to say where the lines lie between professional, social or artistic work. As the divides between these areas increasingly blur, so it is harder to assign a picture to one realm or the other. Fatal pressure is applied to the ideology of artistic autonomy, and with it the autonomy of the individual. If we are all artists, then none of us are.”
I, for one, do not believe that the lines that Stallabrass wrote about matters all that much. Where it matters, and where I think Stallabrass did not fully exploit, is the distribution of photographs, as opposed to the pervasiveness of photography itself. To say social media is shaking this up is an understatement — I don’t think anyone truly knows how this is going to pan out, not in the near future.
The idea of “everyone is a publisher now” provokes a more fruitful discussion than “everyone is a photographer now”. If everyone remembers that, we’d all spend our time better.
It appeared to be a case of kismet that I then stumbled across this quite brilliant article by Mike Johnston over at TOP. His explanation for his distaste for gimmickry in photography is a perfect counterpoint to Stallabrass’ article — that photographers don’t seem to be content to just take photographs, but to hunt for certain elusive, and exclusive, properties that make them stand out from the crowd.
More importantly, Johnston’s point about so many mistaking a photograph’s properties as its qualities really struck home. I think, personally, that this malaise has pretty taken over as photography becomes easier for and more accessible to — creating and sharing and consuming — everyone.
This is symptomatic of that search for uniqueness, that again, Stallabrass hinted at. The application of Instagram filters, the indiscriminate use of expired film, willful cross-processing of slide film, the explosion of lomography, grotesquely composited HDR, the unthinking post-processing using presets in [insert your favourite post-processing software/plugin]…all these are just gimmickry, and has precious little to do with photography.
And gimmickry makes me genuinely angry. It is manifestation of a lazy imagination that is in love with the idea of vision and creativity, but does not want to do the work of creating. It is being in love with the projected idea, a ghost of a vision, without making any effort to realise it.
It is, to put it unkindly, a scam.
Techniques exist to supplement and implement a vision. They should not be the vision itself, and they should definitely not call attention to itself. Photography is a visual art — let the visual content speak for itself, and let the technique fade to the background.
If a photograph is boring, then no amount of visual trickery will make it interesting. You can substitute “visual trickery” with any fashionable photography term (HDR? Instagram Filters? Take your pick.) you want, but it remains true. We should all focus on doing and viewing the work, nothing more.